- All
- Soft Skills
- Critical Thinking
Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community
1
Identify the argument
Be the first to add your personal experience
2
Analyze the structure
Be the first to add your personal experience
3
Evaluate the content
Be the first to add your personal experience
4
Here’s what else to consider
Be the first to add your personal experience
Find expert answers in this collaborative article
Experts who add quality contributions will have a chance to be featured. Learn more
Earn a Community Top Voice badge
Add to collaborative articles to get recognized for your expertise on your profile. Learn more
1 Identify the argument
The first step is to identify the argument that you want to evaluate. An argument is a set of statements that aim to persuade or convince someone of something. Usually, an argument has two main parts: a conclusion and one or more premises. The conclusion is the main claim that the argument tries to establish, while the premises are the reasons or evidence that support the conclusion. To identify the argument, look for words or phrases that indicate the conclusion, such as "therefore", "so", "hence", or "thus". Also, look for words or phrases that indicate the premises, such as "because", "since", "for", or "as". Sometimes, the conclusion or the premises may be implied or hidden, so you may need to infer them from the context or the tone of the speaker or writer.
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
2 Analyze the structure
The next step is to analyze the structure of the argument. This means to examine how the premises and the conclusion are related and organized. There are different types of arguments, such as deductive, inductive, causal, analogical, or ethical. Each type of argument has its own rules and criteria for validity and soundness. For example, a deductive argument is valid if the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises, and sound if the premises are true. An inductive argument is strong if the conclusion is probable or likely based on the premises, and cogent if the premises are reliable and relevant. A causal argument is valid if the cause and the effect are logically connected, and sound if the cause and the effect are empirically verified. An analogical argument is strong if the analogy is relevant and similar, and cogent if there are no significant differences or counterexamples. An ethical argument is valid if the moral principles and values are consistent and coherent, and sound if the moral principles and values are justified and accepted.
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
3 Evaluate the content
The final step is to evaluate the content of the argument. This means to assess the truth, accuracy, relevance, and sufficiency of the premises and the conclusion. To do this, you need to consider your background knowledge, logic, evidence, sources, context, purpose, and audience. Ask yourself questions such as: Are the premises true or false? Are they relevant or irrelevant to the conclusion? Are they sufficient or insufficient to justify the conclusion? Are there any hidden assumptions or biases? Are there any alternative explanations or perspectives? Are there any ethical implications or consequences? By following these steps and tips, you can evaluate arguments more effectively and critically. Furthermore, you can hone your own argumentation skills by applying the same criteria to your own arguments. Evaluating arguments is not only a skill but also a habit of mind that can help you become a better thinker, communicator, and learner.
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
4 Here’s what else to consider
This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking
+ Follow
Rate this article
We created this article with the help of AI. What do you think of it?
It’s great It’s not so great
Thanks for your feedback
Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.
Tell us more
Tell us why you didn’t like this article.
If you think something in this article goes against our Professional Community Policies, please let us know.
We appreciate you letting us know. Though we’re unable to respond directly, your feedback helps us improve this experience for everyone.
If you think this goes against our Professional Community Policies, please let us know.
More articles on Critical Thinking
No more previous content
- Here's how you can ensure successful delegation of complex projects as a critical thinker. 1 contribution
- Here's how you can overcome a professional setback with resilience and success.
- Here's how you can integrate new technology into critical thinking training and education programs.
- Here's how you can anticipate and mitigate risks that may impact meeting deadlines using critical thinking.
No more next content
Explore Other Skills
- Communication
- Interpersonal Skills
- Public Speaking
- Personal Branding
- Leadership Development
- Analytical Skills
- Thought Leadership
- Leadership
- Research Skills
- Executive Coaching
More relevant reading
- Relationship Building What are the best ways to evaluate reasoning skills in a written report?
- Critical Thinking What techniques improve your ability to analyze arguments?
- Mindfulness Here's how you can apply key principles of logical reasoning as a professional.
- Analytical Skills What are the best practices for evaluating arguments?
Help improve contributions
Mark contributions as unhelpful if you find them irrelevant or not valuable to the article. This feedback is private to you and won’t be shared publicly.
Contribution hidden for you
This feedback is never shared publicly, we’ll use it to show better contributions to everyone.